Decision details

1.      That the early TfGM analysis of the Integrated Rail Plan be noted and that it also be noted that it fell substantially short of expectations in terms of connectivity through HS2 on both the east and western side of the country and linked by a high speed east & west (HS3/Northern Powerhouse Rail) service.

2.      That it be noted that Manchester City Council would be bringing forward further evidence of the detrimental economic and wider regenerational impact as a consequence of the proposed overground station development proposals for Manchester Piccadilly.

3.      That it be noted that there were ongoing strategic discussion underway with Trafford Council regarding the wider impact of the proposals, noting the scope for similar discussions across GM regarding the wider impact and opportunities including active travel solutions that may potentially arrive from HS2 that the opportunities be raised with Government continuously.

4.      That it be noted that the GM Mayor would relay these concerns through the Transport for the North Board.

5.      That it be noted that collectively the Northern Leaders, were considering options, including proposals for land value capture along the original proposed new line from Liverpool through Warrington to Manchester Airport and Bradford/Leeds, as an alternative proposal for submission to Government.

6.      That it be noted work was underway to respond to the HS2 Bill, including petitioning specifically against the Bill if it included the surface level Piccadilly Rail Station.