The GMCA has responsibility under the Police
(Conduct) Regulations 2020 for the attendance at Police Misconduct
Panels of a Legally Qualified Chair (LQP) and Independent Panel
member (IPM).
The LQP’s role is to sit on the Panel in an advisory
capacity. This will not be a decision-making role, but they will be
responsible for providing legal or procedural advice.
The IPMs provide independent and impartial views at the misconduct
panel. Concerns have arisen regarding the indemnification of LQPs
involved in the misconduct process, which provides LQPs with
security against legal liability, provided they act in good faith
during the misconduct panel process. This arises from the potential
of a claim for damages against misconduct panel members arising
from an Equality Act claim before the Employment Tribunal at
present.
On 26th November 2021 the GMCA was informed by the President of the
National Association for LQCs (NALQC) that the organisation had
informed the Home Secretary, H.M. Government, that the NALQC had
advised its members that they should refuse to accept any further
LQP appointments until this matter has been resolved nationally and
specifically worded indemnity is provided by PCCs to its
members.
As a result, the majority of LQPs were refusing to sit on
misconduct panels until an agreed form of indemnity was
provided.
In October 2022, a further development arose out of an LQP having
been summoned by an employment tribunal to give evidence about a
Police Misconduct Panel hearing they chaired and the decision they
reached.
The previous decision notice refers to the form of wording that was
agreed with LQPs at that point in time but is now deemed by LQPs to
be insufficiently robust to provide sufficient assurance in the
event of legal action being taken against them. The purpose of this
decision notice is to seek the approval to adopt the revised
wording agreed by the Association of Policing and Crime Chief
Executives (APACE), APACE and National Association of LQPs as a
form of indemnity which offers LQPs and IPMs assurance that they
are covered for damages unless it is shown in a court or similar
that they have acted in bad faith.
This is similar to the wording of the magistrate’s indemnity
set out in the Courts Act 2003. It provides the GMCA with a
backstop to ensure that LQPs act professionally in their role as a
panel chair under the previous regulations. The GMCA has been
advised to adopt the indemnity wording that is detailed in this
decision notice by the Association of Police and Crime
Commissioners (APCC). It is recommended that this wording be used
until such time that the Home Office agrees an appropriate
legislative solution for LQPs and IPMs.
Decision type: Non-key
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Notice of proposed decision first published: 19/09/2024
Decision due: 25 Jul 2024 by Director for Safer and Stronger Communities, GM Deputy Mayor, Group Finance Officer
Contact: Ashleigh Kent-Stallwood Email: ashleigh.kent-stallwood@greatermanchester-ca.gov.uk.